Middlesborough Social Care At It Again
Written by Aaron Kearney on 16 May 2025
Table of Contents Show
A 31-year-old Middlesbrough man, known publicly as Mr B, has once again been left without vital care support, despite previously having his carers reinstated. This marks the second time Mr B has lost access to essential care, sparking renewed concern about the interpretation and application of the Care Act 2014.
Mr B, who lives with multiple health conditions and relies on daily assistance to manage his needs, had his care package removed by a local authority social worker. According to Mr B and his legal representative, the decision was based on an outdated care assessment — something explicitly prohibited under current legislation.
“The Care Act is clear,” said a spokesperson for a local law firm now representing Mr B. “Assessments must be current and reflect the individual's present needs. Using an old assessment goes against the very principle of person-centred care enshrined in the Act.”
This latest development comes after a story published last year drew public attention to Mr B’s situation, which prompted authorities to reinstate his care. However, the recent withdrawal has raised serious questions about ongoing oversight and compliance within the local adult social care team.
Mr B, visibly distressed, said, “I feel let down all over again. This isn’t just about paperwork — this is my life. Without care, I’m at serious risk.”
The law firm supporting Mr B has confirmed they are prepared to take legal action if necessary, potentially setting a precedent for others in similar situations. They stress the importance of fair assessments and adherence to legal obligations by all social care professionals.
A request for comment has been made to the local authority, but no official response has yet been received.
As Mr B waits for a resolution, his supporters are calling for transparency and urgent review of the handling of his case, urging that no individual in need should fall through the cracks of a system designed to protect them.
Update: 16/05/2025
After the story broke Mr B has been given his care back with a new care company starting 17/05/2025.
Middlesbrough Council has refused to comment