Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
|
Animal Rising has released footage from facilities as part of its probe into the RSPCA’s “Assured Scheme,” which certifies farms, food producers, and retailers meeting specific animal welfare standards.
The RSPCA responded by stating it takes poor animal welfare allegations “incredibly seriously.” The charity denied claims of inaction, highlighting increased unannounced visits and exploring the use of bodyworn cameras and CCTV as measures to address concerns.
In June, the RSPCA commissioned an independent review of 200 farms under its scheme, concluding it was “operating effectively” to ensure welfare on member farms. Speaking to Radio 4’s PM programme, Chris Packham announced his resignation from the RSPCA.
While acknowledging the charity’s significant contributions, Packham described the Assured Scheme as a “millstone” and accused the RSPCA of “propping up the meat industry” despite inadequate welfare standards.
He pointed to “serious transgressions” at assured farms and abattoirs, referencing the “horrific” footage uncovered. The RSPCA suspended implicated facilities and launched investigations, but Packham said such responses had become routine without substantial change.
Packham, a long-time campaigner for reform within the Assured Scheme, said he could no longer exert meaningful pressure from within the organization and had to step away. In a statement on Animal Rising’s website, he emphasized prioritizing his “love for animals” over his role, citing “irrefutable evidence of abuse.”

He criticized the RSPCA for failing to enact “meaningful change” despite years of advocacy and accused the charity of losing its mandate to protect animals from cruelty.
Caroline Lucas echoed these concerns in a separate statement, citing undercover footage from Animal Rising as the “final straw.” She condemned systemic abuse at RSPCA-approved slaughterhouses, including improper stunning of pigs, banned electric prodding of cows, and widespread panic among animals during slaughter.
Lucas criticized the RSPCA for suspending implicated facilities without addressing broader flaws in the scheme, arguing this approach risks misleading the public and enabling cruelty.
The RSPCA responded, expressing agreement with Packham and Lucas on many issues but differing on strategies to address farmed animal welfare. The charity defended its actions, noting the independent review confirmed the scheme was improving welfare.
It outlined steps taken, including unannounced visits, bodyworn cameras, and CCTV, supported by a £2m investment. The RSPCA highlighted its pioneering work in introducing industry improvements, such as CCTV in slaughterhouses and banning outdated farming practices.
Animal Rising’s investigation focused on four abattoirs, alleging systemic cruelty. The group reported severe violations, including improper stunning of pigs, electric prodding of cows, panic behaviors, and abusive treatment by workers. It criticized the scheme for failing to prevent these practices, urging stronger measures to protect animals.
Our Top Stories This Week
About The Reporter
Managing Director of Kearney CK Group Limited